Sunday, 27 November 2022

ExplainSpeaking | A profile of Gujarat’s economy before elections

 

Explained

 
 
 
 


Primary school students created a rangoli with a message for Gujarat to get ready for voting ahead of upcoming Assembly election. 📸 Nirmal Harindran

Dear Readers,

  

The western Indian state of Gujarat is set to hold elections for the state Assembly this week. Since the time of India’s freedom struggle, and especially because it was the home state of leaders such as Mahatma Gandhi and Sardar Patel, Gujarat was always a politically significant state in India. 

 

However, two factors have further bolstered the state’s political heft over the past three decades. 

 

One, the Bharatiya Janata Party (or the BJP) has won all the Assembly elections since 1995. And barring a brief period between late 1996 and early 1998, the BJP has been in power in the state. To be precise, it has ruled without break since March 1998. Another five year term would mean that the BJP will extend its unbroken run to 29 years. For perspective, the longest that any party has been in power in a state was the 34 years (1977 to 2011) that the Communist Party of India (Marxist) governed the eastern state of West Bengal.

 

Two, the presence of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, too, lends importance to Gujarat. Modi had served as the Chief Minister for 12 years, winning three Assembly polls in the process, before shifting to Delhi. During Modi’s tenure as the Chief Minister, the notion of a so-called Gujarat model of development or economy gained traction.

 

Here’s a look at the different aspects of Gujarat’s economy — factors such as unemployment, per capita income, inflation etc. that often play a crucial role in influencing the voters. 

 

1: Overall size of the economy

 

No matter which way one calculates, Gujarat is one of the biggest economies in the country. Table 1 details the top 6 states with the highest “net State Domestic Product (SDP)” in India. Think of the net SDP as the GDP equivalent at the state level. The Table also mentions Kerala even though it is not a state of comparable economic output just to provide a more complete picture; often the “Gujarat model” has been contrasted with the “Kerala model”. Between the seven states mentioned in the data tables, one can also get a fairly wide geographical spread. 

 

 

Data shows that Gujarat is the fourth-largest economy with a net SDP of Rs 14.6 lakh crore. However, this valuation of economic output is based on current prices. If one were to remove the effect of inflation and look at the “real” net SDP (column 3), one finds that Gujarat becomes the second-largest economy. 

 

It is also worthwhile to look at where Gujarat stood relative to the other big states in 1994-95, just before the BJP started its dominant phase. It is interesting to note that at that time Gujarat was even behind UP and West Bengal in terms of overall output. The only state that has actually outdone Gujarat is Karnataka, which was much smaller in terms of economic output in 1995 but has since rapidly grown to become the third-largest economy within India. 

 

2: Per Capita Income 

 

When India’s economy recently overtook the economy of the United Kingdom to become the fifth-largest economy on the planet, it was pointed out that despite this achievement, the UK's average income levels were twenty-times more than India’s. 

 

Table 2 attempts to place the same states in terms of per capita income in order to understand the average level of economic prosperity in a state.

 

 

Now, Karnataka turns out to be the state with the highest per capita income, closely followed by Gujarat. This is not to suggest that there are no states in India with higher per capita income — Delhi, Goa Sikkim etc. do score higher — but among the bigger states, this ranking still holds. 

 

Population size of different states imply that UP lags far behind most states in India despite having a much higher overall output. Kerala also shines.

 

When compared to how things were in 1995, it is interesting to note that Gujarat was, even then, the second-richest in terms of average incomes. 

 

And while holding on to the 2nd rank is no mean feat — Tamil Nadu, for instance, failed to stay at the top — it is Karnataka’s rise that has been far more phenomenal.

 

3: Unemployment rate  

 

Table 3 details the unemployment rate (per thousand people) in Rural and Urban areas for the biggest state economies in India (plus Kerala). Gujarat had one of the lowest unemployment rate among all the states and well below the national average. 

 

 

However, unemployment rates have gone up almost across the board since 1999-2000 — the time since when the BJP has had an unbroken streak in the governance of Gujarat. In particular, in Gujarat, both rural and urban unemployment rates have doubled since 1999-00.  

 

4: Inflation rate

 

Just as Gujarat had the lowest unemployment rate among all the big economies, it also had the lowest retail inflation rate among them in each of the past five years (barring UP in 2017-18). Gujarat’s retail inflation rate (that is, based on Consumer Price Index or CPI) was also lower than the national average for each of the five years (see Table 4). Of course, this data does cover the past few months of 2022-23. 

 

 

High inflation has become a global menace and has resulted in voters throwing out incumbent governments to express their anger. However, Gujarat has performed relatively well on this metric for the majority of the current term.

 

5: Wages

 

When it comes to earning daily wages, workers in the agricultural sector as well as the non-agricultural sector of Gujarat earn considerably less than their counterparts in the other big states. Table 5 details how Gujarat not only pays less than the other big economies but also pays less than the national average.

 

 

6: Infrastructure 

 

Chart 6, sourced from the Central Electricity Authority, shows the level of per capita power consumption in the seven states under consideration. Power consumption is a very good proxy for overall infrastructure in any economy. Gujarat’s per capita consumption is the highest among these states and, barring Punjab, the highest among large Indian states. 

 

 

7: Health metrics

 

Typically it is found that financially better off economies tend to have inhabitants who are physically better off. That’s because a rich state with richer inhabitants and a larger government capacity, can invest in improving the health and wellbeing of its inhabitants. 

 

However, it is on these metrics that Gujarat falters the most.

 

Table 7 details Gujarat’s standing on a whole host of crucial metrics. But be it infant mortality rate or the maternal mortality rate or the prevalence of anaemia among infants and pregnant mothers or even indeed the number of beds in government-owned hospitals, Gujarat lags behind the other big economies. In particular, it lags considerably behind the Kerala achievements.

 

 

That was a summary of where Gujarat stands relative to the rest of the country as well as relative to where it was in the past. 

 

Share your views and queries at udit.misra@expressindia.com.

 

Lastly, do watch the latest episode of The Express Economist. This time it features Dr C Rangarajan, former RBI Governor and Chairman of the Finance Commission, on the state of the Indian economy.

 

Stay safe,

Udit 

 

If you received this newsletter as a forward, you can subscribe to it, here.

 

Do read our other Explained articles, here To subscribe to our other newsletters, click here

 

 
 
 
Contact UsUnsubscribeAbout us
 
Copyright © 2020 The Indian Express [P] Ltd. All Rights Reserved
 

Team Melli and the Socrates legacy

 

 
 
 

Dear Express Reader

 

On Monday last, the Iranian football team (Team Melli, as it is popularly known) faced England in its World Cup opener at the Khalifa International Stadium in Doha, Qatar. As is the tradition, the national anthems of the teams were played in the stadium. However, the Iranian players stood quiet as their national anthem was played as a mark of solidarity with the mass protests in their homeland. The protests that started in September when Mansa Amini, a 22-year-old Kurdish-Iranian woman died in state custody, have been brutally handled by the state authorities in Tehran. The Iranian football team's show of defiance in Doha is likely to have major consequences, considering the nature of the authoritarian regime in Tehran. But their eloquent silence has amplified the voice of the protests and taken it to the farthest corners of the world. Sports is entertainment, of course, but its finest moments are laced with politics that celebrate the free spirit. Iran lost the match but the team made history.

 

Our editorial ('Woman, life, liberty', November 23) framed the moment in its context: "Brave as it was, it is important to recognise the gesture of the Iranian footballers as a supporting act to the fearless call of the women of their country for jin, jiyan, azadi (woman, life, freedom). The present movement is a culmination of years of rage and deprivation, of the infringement on women's independent thought and choice. Despite the heavy burden they bear, Iran's women have continued to find ways to rebel against the gender bigotry and the curtailment of human rights that begins but does not end with them, choosing to be survivors standing up to powerful men rather than giving in to archaic demands for conformity." The footballers' act was in step with similar acts of solidarity that the Iranian artists, intellectuals and athletes have shown, wrote Ramin Jahanbegloo ('Apartheid moment for Iran', November 23).

 

Albert Camus famously said that "all that I know most surely about morality and obligations I owe to football". In a different era, on a different continent, Brazilian legend Socrates had turned the beautiful game into a parable of democracy. In the 1980s, Socrates Brasileiro Sampaio de Souza Vieira de Oliveira, a trained medical doctor, with friend Wladimir had organised their footballing colleagues into a utopian socialist cell called the Corinthians Democracy to challenge the hierarchy and inequities in club football. The Corinthians Democracy established that everyone at the São Paulo club, from the president to the cleaners and the kit-men, had an equal vote and every decision taken by the club including travel schedules to which player to sign on was put to vote. Prize money was shared equally among players and a certain percentage of it between all the club staff. Brazil then was under military dictatorship and the Corinthians one of the country's champion football clubs. Millions of Corinthians fans would cheer and chant in the name of democracy when the Socrates-led team took to the field. In the galleries, they would unfurl the banner, "Win or lose, but always with democracy".

 

In the run-up to elections in Brazil on November 15, 1982, Corinthians Democracy voted to print "vote on the fifteenth" on the back of their shirts. The elections — for federal deputies, senators, governors and mayors — were one of the first steps towards ending the dictatorship (Alex Bellos, Futebol: The Brazilian Way of Life). Socrates would say that "it brought a conscience to the people that you could vote and change things — it made people realise together with other movements that were happening in the country that you could make change". In 1982, the Corinthians won the São Paulo state championship with "Democracia" printed on their shirts. Years later, Socrates would tell Bellos, "Perhaps it was the most perfect moment I ever lived. And I am sure it was for 95 per cent of the others too."

 

Socrates captained Brazil's "Class of 82", which included Zico and Falcao, at the 1982 World Cup. The team played glorious football but flattered to deceive and lost out to Italy, the eventual winner. In the 1986 World Cup in Mexico City, he played with a headband that read, "Mexico, Stand Tall". Just ahead of the Cup, an earthquake devastated the city killing over 10,000 people. Socrates had said, "I want to die on a Sunday, the day Corinthians win a title." On December 4, 2011, a Sunday, O Doctor (the doctor) died at the age of 57. The same evening, the Corinthians drew their final league match with Palmeiras to win their fifth Brazilian league title. 

 

In Doctor Socrates, biographer Andre Downie writes: "When the stadium announcer called for a minute's silence, grown men cried and a deafening chant of 'Socrates! Socrates! Socrates!' rang round the magnificent art-deco stadium. Fans held up their right arms, their fists clenched in a military salute, exactly like Socrates did when he scored a goal. Down below them, the Corinthians players lined around the centre circle did the same." As Downie writes, "His actions helped transform not just a football club but a country. He helped Brazil through those pivotal years that led from dictatorship to democracy, and he put his country before himself with a promise to eschew European riches and remain at home to help his people."

 

Socrates would have been proud of the Ehsaan Hajsafi-led Team Melli.   

 

Till next week, 

Amrith

Amrith Lal is Deputy Editor with the Opinion team

 
 
 
 
More Opinions
 
Wannabe Chief Ministers
 
 
Wannabe Chief Ministers
 
 
 
A letter from New York
 
 
A letter from New York
 
 
 
Of caste, privilege and quotas: A reality check
 
 
Of caste, privilege and quotas: A reality check
 
 
 
When the water trains came to parched Rajkot
 
 
When the water trains came to parched Rajkot
 
 
 
Deep, dark corners of the human mind
 
 
Deep, dark corners of the human mind
 
 
 
 
 
Contact UsUnsubscribeAbout Us
 
Copyright © 2021 The Indian Express [P] Ltd. All Rights Reserved
 

⌚Few hours left : Indian Express Digital Subscription for just Rs 999

A special offer from The Indian Express     Dear reader,   We're cutting straight to the point: Don't miss out on our  💥 FLAS...